Pair Left Right

Pair Left Right

Street vendor shows right shoes on the screen, but keeps left shoes in a safe place to prevent theft?

The thief, but no he did not notice, and had 10 Shoes dispalay right when he was distracted by the supplier. The thief quickly discovered that shoes are useless and destroy the stolen property. Later, the thief was caught and the seller sued compensantion. Venodor argues that because lost 10 pairs x $ 50 each, the thief must pay $ 500 in compensation. As evidence, he came within ten shoes left with price tags attached. Thief stole maintains that only half of the goods and pay only $ 250. How should the judge rule?

the judge must order the thief to buy shoes and has paid $ 500. the thief already taken the shoes right to be paid over to the right and left. edit or continue to deny the request, the judge just say the price of 10 right shoes is equivalent to his right foot. So pay for a pair of shoes was only then need to left, but not Victims seller. Well, he could always buy from the same supplier, for only half the price (because they have paid with his right foot), but if the thief was in their right mind think that he would be willing to sacrifice some in exchange for $ 250.

The left just want to be right and the right to sit at dinner together, my friends and I were in close physical contact. More than one time, the person to my left and the weapons found in eating. "Ah, you left hand! Messing things flow," he joked, but his words to me realize that "the supremacy of law" is not only alive, even served on my table.